I was watching TSN’s The Reporters this
morning and a discussion about visors and fighting ensued, and so I thought I’d
jot down some of my own thoughts when it comes to fisticuffs.
I’ve got no issues with fighting so long
as it isn’t a sideshow between two players who play for two minutes a night. I can appreciate the lengths the sport has
gone to in their efforts to keep hockey a sport based on clean physical play,
goals, saves, and fast skating; but I just think fighting is something that has
its place in certain games.
I’ll give a couple of examples based on
SJHL games I saw this weekend:
Friday night, Tyler Giebel and Tyler Bird engaged in a fight that was, perfectly, warranted. It was at the end of a shift and the two players were competing against one another intently in the corner. Unfortunately, the fight occurred with, approximately, nine and a half minutes remaining in the third period so both players were ejected based on a rule that states if you drop your mitts with under ten minutes to go in regulation then you are punted from the game. Had that game gone to overtime, Yorkton would have been without a first line forward, simply because he was competing hard, physically, in the corner. That doesn’t sound right to me. I realize the intent is to prevent fights breaking out after every stoppage of play with two minutes remaining in the game; but can’t we have some discretion?
Friday night, Tyler Giebel and Tyler Bird engaged in a fight that was, perfectly, warranted. It was at the end of a shift and the two players were competing against one another intently in the corner. Unfortunately, the fight occurred with, approximately, nine and a half minutes remaining in the third period so both players were ejected based on a rule that states if you drop your mitts with under ten minutes to go in regulation then you are punted from the game. Had that game gone to overtime, Yorkton would have been without a first line forward, simply because he was competing hard, physically, in the corner. That doesn’t sound right to me. I realize the intent is to prevent fights breaking out after every stoppage of play with two minutes remaining in the game; but can’t we have some discretion?
Last night in Humboldt, the Broncos
outshot Flin Flon 16-5 in the first period and the Bombers didn’t have a shot
in the final thirteen minutes of the frame.
Had the second period started with a scrap to try and get the Bombers
going a little bit then I really have no issue with it. Some will say a fight such as this does
nothing; but if Andy Blanke, soundly, wins a scrap with Adam Antkowiak to start
the second period; I suspect you will see (maybe only temporary) a lift in play
from the Bombers. It’s up to the
offensive players to keep that momentum going forward. Further to that, I remember some Melville
Millionaire players acting a bit more brave in last year’s playoff series with
Yorkton after Colin Mospanchuk dropped the gloves with Kailum Gervais. To me, this is part of the game.
I’m not saying hockey should promote
fighting, but I really don’t think the sport needs to go to the great lengths
it has to curb it and in the two examples I listed above, that’s exactly the
case. I think it reduces emotion and
lowers compete level to put deterring measures in place.
I don’t know if the lack of fighting
really hurts fan interest when it comes to the NHL, but I do feel at the junior
level, the lack of the prospect of seeing a fight has kept some fans away. This isn’t something we like to talk about,
but the reality is that if I mentioned Derek Parker, Barry Sparvier, Jordan
Hack, and Mitch Stephens; there is a really good chance you will recall
specific instances involving the first two then you will the last two names. Imagine the interest generated if Trent
Cassan spoke out in an interview and said if the Millionaires go within five
feet of Jeremy Johnson then they’ll have to deal with John Odgers? In today’s world, a public mention like that
from Cassan may get him a fine.
The most popular sport in the world right
now is MMA. I’ve watched guys get
punched and kicked in the head AFTER they’ve already been knocked out. Meanwhile, hockey is banning fighting. I realize it’s a different kettle of fish
when dealing with junior aged hockey players (although most players are between
18 and 20 and therefore considered adult); but the NHL should simply say it’s a
contact sport and these participants are adults and capable of making their own
decisions.
Hockey is a sport where rule changes are
discussed constantly. For me, you can
improve the game by making all goalies where gear similar to what Patrick Roy
wore in 1993 (it should be noted that in 1993 there were critics who said Roy
had an unfair advantage because of the size of his equipment) and take out the
restrictive rules on fighting. That’s
it. Some of this stuff involving players
getting suspended will go by the wayside as players would then be allowed to police
it themselves. I’d like to see a game
like that, but I’m not sure I ever will.
I'd rather watch Bird than Mospanchuk anyday. That guy sticks up for his teammates game after game and never gets the credit he deserves. Oh I forgot he's not 6 feet.
ReplyDelete